Drench resistant Cooperia build up rapidly
| This article
originally appeared in Country-Wide Magazine. |
|
BIll
Pomoroy
Institute of Veterinary,
Animal and Biomedical Sciences
Massey University
A trial designed to investigate the production cost of Cooperia
in cattle indicates large populations of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia
can build up rapidly.
Bill
Pomroy says the trial was set up on a property with known ivermectin-
resistant Cooperia in order to observe the effect of ‘survivor’
Cooperia on one group of animals, compared to another group effectively
treated with anthelmintics.
There were four replicates of two different drench treatments. In
total eight paddocks with 140 weaner bulls split evenly between
them were observed from January 1 until July 1 2001. Four paddocks
of the weaner bulls were treated with Ivomec pour-on at four weekly
intervals from January 1. The other four paddocks of bulls were
treated with a combination benzimidazole (BZ) and levamisole drench
at four weekly intervals and a 130-day Ivomec bolus. Faecal egg
counts were taken monthly from each of the eight mobs until July.
The mean faecal egg counts for cattle treated with Ivomec pour-on
increased steadily from about 90 FEC (eggs/g) in February to about
350 FEC in April, but then began to drop steadily until the end
of the trial.
Bill Pomroy says although 350 FEC would be considered a “time
to drench” level of parasite infection, it indicated only
modest worm burdens in the bulls treated with pour-on. The decline
in egg count in the second half of the study indicates the usual
development of immunity to this particular worm and resulting lowered
FEC.
The mean faecal egg counts for cattle treated with the combination
drench and bolus hovered just under 50 FEC until May when it began
a gradual increase, ending the trial in July at about 100 FEC.
Pomroy says this indicates the bolus, which produced a 100% reduction
in faecal egg counts in previous studies at
Massey University’s bull beef unit, was not effective.
“I was planning for that combination drench and bolus to produce
zero FEC, whereas I was expecting leakage egg counts increasing
in the other mobs treated with Ivomec pouron.”
The liveweight of each of the eight mobs of cattle was monitored
at the same intervals as the faecal egg counts. The mean weights
indicated the four mobs treated with the combination drench and
bolus were 14kg heavier at the end of the study, but Bill Pomroy
says this was not statistically significant.
The most telling aspect of the trial were the worm counts of tracer
calves, which grazed the eight paddocks for two weeks at the end
of the trial. These were 21,000 Cooperia in tracer calves that had
grazed where bulls treated with Ivomec pour-on had spent the previous
six months. In contrast, tracer calves that grazed where bulls had
been treated with the combination drench and bolus only had an average
of 1300 Cooperia. Pomroy says this difference is statistically significant
and raises the question of the production impact from grazing those
areas for a second season.
“The main message is that Cooperia didn’t cause a significant
production effect in the first season, but you would have to query
what would happen if the trial was continue for another year.”
He says the trial results mimic the situation where a farmer uses
an ivermectin-type drench in the presence of ivermectin-resistant
Cooperia.
Institute of Veterinary,
Animal and Biomedical Sciences
Massey University
|